Failure Will Become a Learning Mode

Although, by definition, it’s impossible to solve a wicked problem I think our team has taken a good first step and laid out a clear roadmap to help create some possibilities in starting to solve failure as a learning mode.

As this semester comes to a close I can’t help but reflect on a plethora of things. I’ve connected with people all over the world and learned a wicked amount about technology in education. What I have learned about “wicked problems” is that they cannot be solved alone. Collaboration is vital to questioning, critical thinking and coming up with solutions.

Our website (linked below) depicts the collaborative efforts we took to “solve” an unsolvable problem. While not feasible at first glance, a wicked problem is something that must be researched and critically thought through in order to properly understand and make progress on.

https://cep812failureasalearningmode.weebly.com/

Passion, Curiosity and Beautiful Questions

Passion can be defined as a strong and barely controllable emotion. Passion, sometimes, cannot be identified at first sight. A quote from A More Beautiful Question, by Warren Berger, said, “You just don’t know about people and what drives them until you spend time sitting on the floor, listening to someone tell you their story” (Berger, 2014). This powerful message comes from Jacqueline Novogratz, who left her corporate high paying job to work for a nonprofit women’s organization. I truly believe that you won’t know someone’s true passions and curiosities unless you listen to them and question.

As an educator, my passion is to make an impact on a child’s life. Providing them with the skills they need to be a part of the ever-changing world. My passion will always be about teaching children but the methods and philosophies to do so may change through self-reflection and questioning. Through curiosity those questions will be asked and created to assist in fulfilling my passion.

pqcq_34942686

References:

Berger, W. (2014). A more beautiful question. New York, NY. Bloomsbury USA.

Final Thoughts for CEP 811

CEP 811 is coming to an end. The last 7 weeks have really pushed my thinking, especially because I was taking two courses for my Masters in the Educational Technology program at Michigan State University at the same time. As I reflect on what I have learned about adapting innovative technology to education, I can’t help but think about the projects that I participated in. The projects were engaging, fun, and full of technology integration. Each project allowed me to take a step back and review my current teaching practice. I explored tools that support teacher and student learning, created a Maker-lesson, explored a Makey-Makey Kit, redesigned my future classroom using an application I had zero experience with, and studied constructivism a little deeper. Having experienced much more than I mentioned above, I have acquired some new thinking about Maker Education. I really believe that everyone is a maker. This comes from my own experience of using novel applications and tool kits to make, create, and show my learning. I have learned to appreciate the process of creating as much as the end product.

Throughout the making process, failures are experienced and true learning happens. I now think that working collaboratively helps individuals feel smarter than the smartest person in the group and that it is an essential piece to creativity. Although the maker movement can be complex, it is also very intuitive. I was able to teach myself and learn through the process. I am confident that students will be able to work through new technology and materials intuitively as well.

My new thinking has allowed me to participate in new professional learning for my school. My principal knows that I am currently in the Educational Technology program and I have mentioned some of the things that I have learned in my courses. He asked me to represent our school and district in professional development on New Pedagogies for Deep Learning. Our district is in the beginning stages of shifting towards an education reform for 21st century learners. I am looking forward to building my expertise by using technology in innovative ways.

Current K-12 students have never experienced life without the Internet. As an educator and a student in the Masters of Educational Technology Program, my hope for the future is that the education system provides learning opportunities and literacies through integration and implementation of technology. Our students need to become modern learners to be a part of the modern world. I am proud to be a part of this program at Michigan State University and the future change in our education systems.

Assessing Creativity

As educators, we need to seriously rethink how we transform educational institutions to become relevant to the demands of the 21st century. The core competencies to this type of educational reform include collaboration, digital literacy, critical thinking and problem solving. We need to help students thrive in today’s innovative world. The core competencies of the 21st century learner tend to be unaddressed in the assessments and rubrics used to identify students learning and if the competencies are addressed the criteria is unclear with non-specific and unrelated language.

As an educator charged with the assessment of student learning, and a believer in the 21st century education reform, strategic rubrics need to be developed that will assess creativity, collaboration, digital literacies, critical thinking and problem solving with specific and clear language that helps users reliably agree on the “score” and give the appropriate feedback to the learner (Buck Institute for Education, 2011).

Taking tests after learning information is not a realistic form of assessment (Gee 2010), but we continue to assess students only after they have consumed something instead of the process of production. True learning happens when students are working through a process and consider the copious amounts of feedback given by their instructor through that entire production process. The production process is valued in maker education. Maker education “is an approach that positions agency and student interest at the center, asking students to become more aware of the design of the world around them, and begin to see themselves as people who can tinker, hack and improve that design” (“Maker Ed”, 2012). In Maker education, students play an important role in their learning because it is based off of their interests. In maker-inspired projects and lessons, students and teachers should jointly develop the rubrics and assessments (Buck Institute for Education, 2011). Student feedback and input can happen through whole group or small group discussions when constructing a rubric for the core competencies in 21st century learning.

I recently have been to a professional develop on New Pedagogies for Deep Learning (NPDL) that works with teachers to design learning experiences that build on learners strengths and needs, creating new knowledge using real life problem-solving. NPDL has 6 learning competencies that each student needs to achieve in the designing of learning experiences. One of the 6 competencies includes creativity. According to NPDL, creativity means “having an ‘entrepreneurial eye’ for economic and social opportunities, asking the right inquiry questions to generate novel ideas, and leadership to pursue those ideas and turn them into action” (2018). After modeling what “creativity” looks like for the students, the rubric can be co-constructed for the specific project/standards so students know where to drive their creativity and the instructor knows when given feedback is most beneficial in the students learning process.

Now, those original rubrics will be most likely be recreated and redeveloped based on observations after the implementation. Educators must be flexible when doing this. A great example of flexibility comes from a school in Baltimore, Maryland called Green Street Academy (GSA). GSA began the process to transform their school into a Project Based Learning Environment. After their first week of piloting their project the teaching group identified some critical “lessons learned”. Eric Isselhardt states that, “As a teaching group, we must maintain a flexible, problem-solving attitude to productively work through the inevitable implementation challenges” (2013). Assessments and rubrics will inevitably be a challenge when transformation and change is occurring.

It is time for the education system to meet the learners where they are and where they can go. To transform educational institutions we must transform everything, including our assessments. As educators, we must be flexible in this problem-solving process of assessments and most certainly need to include our students in those transformation discussions. After all, they are the future.

References:

Maker Education Initiative. (n.d.). Retrieved December 11, 2018, from https://makered.org/

New Pedagogies for Deep Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved December 11, 2018 from http://npdl.global

Gee, J. (2010, July 20). James Paul Gee on Grading with Games [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU3pwCD-ey0

Isslehardt, E. (2013, February 11). Creating Schoolwide PBL Aligned to Common Core [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/PBL-aligned-to-common-core-eric-isslehardt

Buck Institue for Education (2011). Rubric for Rubrics. Retrieved from https://www.bie.org/object/document/rubric_for_rubrics

 

Maker Education In a Thousand Words

Maker Education is a concept that is floating around the education world. Educators have been inspired by the movement, but sometimes it can be daunting to be a part of the initiative without the clear information. One of the most efficient ways to dissect an intimidating topic is with an infographic.

An infographic is worth a thousand words. Infographics provide an easy to understand overview of a topic. Infographics are developed by using striking, engaging visuals to communicate information quickly.

We are all makers. Below is my infographic on the terminology, theory and benefits of Maker Education!

makereducation_34942686

References:

Sheridan, K. Halverson, E.R., Litts, B.K., Brahms, L, Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014) Learning in the making: A comparative case-study of three maker spaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505-565.

Maker Education Initiative. (n.d.). Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://makered.org/

Long, C. (n.d.). Teach Your Students to Fail Better with Design Thinking. Retrieved December 8, 2018, from https://www.iste.org/resources/Product?ID=2332

Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C., Dr. (2009). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal,17(3), 8-18. Retrieved December 8, 2018

Martinez, S.L., & Stager, G. S. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Constructing modern knowledge press

White House. (2014, June 17). Presidential proclamation-National day of making. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/06/17/presidentail-proclamation-national-day-making-2014

alex80 (2017, October 8). Abstract pattern background  [Online Image]. Retrieved from https://pixabay.com/en/abstract-pattern-background-design-2829962/

Less Definitely Gets You More When We Redesign

As an educator, we are programed to consciously reflect on our teaching practice. We can reflect on things such as classroom management, lesson delivery, philosophies, implementation of new ideas, and so on and so forth. We tweak, remove, add and change the things that we do to better our practice and our students. Something that is difficult to change, and rather costly, is the design of our classroom. We are given 4 empty walls, sometimes with a whiteboard or Smart Board, furniture that may or may not fit within those 4 walls, and some places to store our items that are not in use. We are forced to design our classroom with the “front of the room” in mind (usually where the Smart Board is).

This week, as a part of one of my graduate courses at Michigan State University, I was asked to reflect on my original classroom design through 21st century eyes. I used a program called Sketch Up to redesign/reimagine my classroom to encourage collaborative learning, maker spaces and personalized learning.

The Current Design:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

According to The Third Teacher: 79 Ways You Can Use Design to Transform Teaching & Learning, “If we truly believe that creativity is an essential ingredient in a child’s development, then we need to shift completely away from the “cells and bells” model of school design. So the other fundamental question we should be asking is: Does this learning environment support a child’s natural instinct to learn through creation and discovery?” (OWP/P Architects, 2010, p. 56). When reimaging my classroom, I wanted to address the major issues and limitations of my classroom. Large, bulky, immobile furniture, awkward wall and counter space, limited pathways for mobility, lack of makers/collaborative space, and limited areas to work were the few apparent items. I turned to research to help tackle these room design issues. In a study by Barrett, Zhang, Moffat & Kobbacy (2013) they stated that students worked better with natural light, furniture that was purpose-built that could be moved around the room to accommodate the range of learning activities, and walls and floor colored matter. More specifically, cool bright colors seemed best for younger students. Taking all of this into consideration, I reimagined my classroom.

The Reimaged Classroom:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

In the reimagined classroom, the saying “Less is More” is very apparent. Less bulky furniture created more space for students to move about in the classroom. The counter space was used for more collaborative or personalized space to work, where natural light comes in through the window. A large table, completed with storage on the bottom, is used as a maker’s space where creation and discovery can happen. Comfortable seating facing a white board provides a space for students to work collaboratively for learning. Tables that can be manipulated and rearranged around the classroom can allow students to work in specific small or large groups. The height of the desks can be adjusted if students would like to sit on the floor or stand up to complete a task. Personalized feedback has its own area where a teacher and student can discuss a child’s feedback away from other learners. Lastly, two of the four walls were painted a bright cool green to providing a warm and inviting environment.

To make this reimagined design come to life, many factors come into play. Where will the funds come from and the manpower to transform this room into a 21st century design? Teachers can research grants to apply for that would help the design come to life. They can also reach out to organizations such as Parent Teacher Association (PTA), who put on fundraisers throughout the school year to support their school. Parents, students, teachers and community members could volunteer their time to transform the classroom that would support the learning of the whole child. Summer vacation is a more beneficial time to complete a project like this. It gives time for the teacher to organize their belongings and remove items that could get in the way of the project. Removal of furniture, moving in the new furniture and a fresh coat of paint has a positive impact on the way students can learn. Financial aspects for this project can be quiet scary at first (especially for all the modern furniture ranging from $75-$3,000 for an individual item) but the benefits of redesigning the classroom that will provide an engaging learning environment for our future individuals is priceless.

References:

Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678-689. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016

OWP/P Architects, VS Furniture, & Bruce Mau Design. (2010). The third teacher: 79 ways you can use design to transform teaching & learning. Retrieved from http://thethirdteacherplus.com/s/Ch2-TTT-for-Web-0y6k.pdf

Failure as a Learning Mode Survey

“Failure as a Learning Mode” is a wicked problem. Failure is a necessary part of learning. Unfortunately, in schools, failure is viewed as insufficient learning rather than an important building block of learning. Grading and social norms criticize mistakes, which diminishes students’ desire to take risks that could lead to discovery.

Overall, failure seems to be avoided and not incorporated in the learning process. It is difficult to incorporate these ideas and model for learners that failure can lead to learning because of our own ideas or because of outside restraints placed on us. Further, changing the students’ parents’, and administrators’ views of failure is a monumental task; which is why it is considered a wicked problem.

Please consider answering this short survey about the wicked problem of “Failure as a Learning Mode” in our professional context. There are 9 questions. It should take you about 5 minutes to answer them.

I have crafted this survey, with my colleagues, for an assignment that is part of my graduate program in educational technology at Michigan State University. I also hope that the results will inform discussions and planning for technology integration in the work we do together, and with students. Your feedback back that you provide will also inform us on how to approach our solution to this wicked problem.

Your answers will be collected anonymously — please do not give your name or any other personally identifiable information. I will analyze this data and submit them for evaluation to my professors at Michigan State University. I will share my analyses with you once they are complete. I really hope this survey helps us to gather data that we can use and create solutions to solve this truly wicked problem.

You can find the survey by clicking here.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

 

 

Reading Lesson MAKEoveR

I hope you noticed the word Maker in the word Makeover in the title of this post!

Are you inspired by the Maker Movement? Do you design lessons based of the framework of the Common Core State Standards? Do you ever struggle trying to combine the two?

I teach second grade and one of the Common Core State Standards that my students are required to master is to describe the overall structure of the story. In fact, this standard is embedded in K-2 Common Core State Standards. I have taken a lot of interest in the maker movement and I wanted to create a lesson that supports student learning in reading. Sometimes retelling becomes redundant, using the same graphic organizers and questions stems. What better way to remove the redundancy and give your students an opportunity to show you what they learned by creating something collaboratively!

This lesson is jam packed with information, inspiration, imagination and creativity! Students work in a group that is driven by their interests, and they work together to show what they have learned.

The maker movement is making its way into the education world, inspiring educators everywhere. Creating lessons for your students to “make” things while still meeting the standards that you are required to teach is such a powerful initiative.

 

I encourage you to view my lesson here.

 

References:

Makey Makey. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://makeymakey.com/

Lettechaboutit. (2018, November 12) Makey makey sip and retell [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://letstechaboutit966295743.wordpress.com/2018/11/12/makey-makey-sip-and-retell/

msweinlander. (2014, July 9). Making music [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://msweinlander.wordpress.com/2014/07/09/making-music/

Thirdgradeteacherlady. (2016, November 13). Imagining new parks for chicago: third graders as city planners [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://thirdgradeteacherlady.wordpress.com/2016/11/13/imaging-new-parks-for-chicago-third-graders-as-city-planners/

Makey Makey (2018, October 18) Fall makey makey maze challenge [Blog post]. Retrieved https://makeymakey.com/blogs/blog/fall-makey-makey-maze-challenge

(www.soundplant.org) (1999-2018). Soundplant – The computer keyboard sound triggering software. Retrieved from http://www.soundplant.org

Quicktime player. (2010, May 10). Quicktime Player 7 for Mac OS X v10.6.3 or later (Version 10) [Computer application software]. Retrieved from https://support.apple.com/kb/DL923?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Rickabaugh, J. (2015). Including the learner in personalized learning. connect: Making learning personal. ().Center on Innovations in Learning, Temple University. 1301 Cecil B Moore Avenue Ritter Annex 422, Philadelphia, PA 19122. Retrieved from ERIC Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/docview/1720066430?accountid=12598

Rickabaugh, J. (2012). The learning independence continuum. Pewaukee, WI: The Institute @ CESA #1.

O’Donnell, A. (2012). Constructivism. In APA Educational Psychology Handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, Constructs, and Critical Issues. K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan (Editors-in-Chief). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/13273-003.

 

 

Defining Questions for Failure as a Learning Mode

Approaching a problem by asking questions is what directs our paths to solutions. Those solutions may or may not fail, but identifying the successes and the “what went wrong” in failure is how we learn. And this, what I just mentioned, is my wicked problem. To rephrase, my wicked problem is how can we allow failure to be as powerful a learning mode as success.

Thankfully, I am not alone in this process of “solving” this wicked problem. I have the opportunity to work with my colleagues from my Masters of Educational Technology Program at Michigan State University. The members of my group share the same passion and interest in solving this problem full of wickedness. We had a chance to collaborate and discuss our questions, brainstormed prior to our meeting, that we thought would help us understand our problem. We found that a lot of our questions intersected or connected with one another. We were then given the task to prioritize our questions, all 62 of them, into three to five that would define our problem. It was difficult to narrow down our long list of questions into four “why” questions that would define our wicked problem. With careful thought, we decided on the following questions below:

  • Why does failure have a negative connotation?
  • Why do we only evaluate success?
  • Why is it difficult to incorporate failure as a learning mode in the classroom?
  • Why do students “fear” failure?

My infographic, designed using Piktochart, represents the complexity of the problem. I reflected on the multiple stakeholders that would be in the process of solving this wicked problem and questioning that will help drive conversations that need to start to begin this change.

failureislearni_34530979-3.png

References:

Create Infographics, Presentations & Flyers | Piktochart. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://piktochart.com/

Ferguson, M. (2013). Failure IS an option. The Phi Delta Kappan,95(4), 68-69. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/stable/23611840

Bartels, J. M., & Herman, W. E. (2011). Fear of failure, self-handicapping, and negative emotions in response to failure. (). Retrieved from ERIC Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/docview/964173953?accountid=12598

Lahey, J. (2013). The gift of failure: how the best parents learn to let go so their children can succeed. New York, NY : HarperCollins

Unknown (1945, June 27).  Winston churchill during the general election campaign in 1945 [Online Image].  Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Winston_Churchill_during_the_General_Election_Campaign_in_1945_HU55965.jpg

Bon Appetit- Information Diet

I am guilty of the 21st century compulsive behavior to take out my phone for no particular reason and check if I have any indication of incoming information, without being consciously aware. The incoming information can come from a multitude of things such as social media, news outlets, and Internet search engines. The most frightening part about this information is that it may or may not be deemed accurate.

Humans have the desire to know everything that goes on around them and tend to become addicted to knowing those things. We seek to get that information as quickly as possible. The information that we consume is known as our Information Diet (infodiet), things we have the desire to know because it is something we have interest in. Reflecting on my own infodiet, I realize that I tailor the majority of my information gathering to social media outlets like Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. I occasionally “swipe right” on my Smartphone and see headlines about current events, gathering all the information I need to know just from the title of the articles. What a poor way to nutritiously gain new information. I follow certain information on my social media that I am passionate about or have interest in. If it doesn’t interest me, I unfortunately avoid consuming it. My Personal Learning Network (PLN) reflects the same infodiet that I indulged and therefore does not provide a diverse outlet. I share my passions with my PLN without sharing contradicting information to argue it. My current infodiet lacks multiple perspectives to push my thinking.

I recently studied the work of James Paul Gee. Gee asks a thoughtful question “Why isn’t it a good thing that each person and group can “do their own thing?” (2013, p. 117-118). This question pushed my thinking about having a well-rounded infodiet versus a strict interest driven infodiet. Gee helped me understand that my poor infodiet stems from “what is called a “confirmation bias” (sometimes called a “my-side bias”). This is a seemingly built-in mental bias that makes humans favor information that confirms their beliefs. Because of this bias, people seek out and remember information that supports their beliefs, and ignore information that does not” (p. 2). To remove myself from this confirmation bias, I took on the challenge of adding sources of information that would aid in the creation of a “healthy and well-balanced” infodiet. To do this I decided to seek out information that offered a diverse perspective.

I found it challenging to work around “filter bubbles” that are inevitably apart of my personalized web (Pariser, 2011). This task was difficult because personalized webs help you get information that removes the skeptics and diverse outlooks. I tried to research different outlets that disagreed with my views on education, and hope they would lead to their Twitter accounts. It was hard to sift through the infodiets of others and deem them as something reliable. This poses a problem when finding credible and diverse research that can help define questions and solutions for my wicked problem of allowing failure to be as powerful a learning mode as success. With many opinions, insights, and research on the Internet about the positive and negative impacts failure has on individuals, where does one begin to search, sift and identify the “filter bubbles” that could prevent me from viewing the many perspectives behind my wicked problem? I’m coming to the realization that wicked problems perpetuate themselves, especially when you want to question separate wicked problems. Having a well-balanced Infodiet can be considered a “wicked problem” if we cannot critically think through the information that is presented and create an informative opinion about it. We just end up finding ourselves digesting things and believing them.

As an educator, it’s important that we asked open-ended questions to spark critical thinking in learners. We must also give students opportunities to brainstorm and analyze things for themselves from those open-ended questions. The question of “why?” should be at the forefront of all students minds. This can help students in recognizing when information is accurate or inaccurate. To help students have a “healthy” infodiet they must know how to sift through the constant information that is being fed to them from multiple sources.

Here’s a quick view of some information I have added to my diet!

References:

Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pariser, E. (2011 May 12). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. Westminster, London. Penguin.